Risk & Return
The more risk you take, the higher the expected return — but also the greater the possible downside outcomes. Diversification reduces risk without proportionally reducing return.
2.1 What is risk?
In the financial world, risk is measured as the spread of returns — how wide the range of outcomes can be. The most commonly used measure is the standard deviation (also called volatility): the larger the standard deviation, the greater the uncertainty about the final return.
The distribution of returns theoretically follows a bell curve (normal distribution). Each curve has the same centre (average expected return), but the width differs. With savings you know almost exactly what you'll get. With stocks or crypto the actual outcome can be far from the average, in both positive and negative directions.
This is the central principle of modern portfolio theory: investors demand a risk premium for taking on additional risk. Nobody would knowingly accept more risk if the expected return were not higher.
The upward-sloping line is the capital market line: each step to the right (more risk) brings a higher expected return. Investors who want no additional risk receive the risk-free rate (savings). Those who buy stocks receive a risk premium on top of that rate as compensation for the uncertainty.
Important caveat: these are expected returns. In practice, outcomes can deviate significantly, especially in the short term.
Rule of thumb: The higher the potential return, the higher the risk. A good investment strategy often combines multiple categories, tailored to your time horizon, risk tolerance and financial goals.
2.2 Portfolio Theory and Diversification
Harry Markowitz showed in 1952 that combining investments that do not move in perfect lockstep reduces the risk of a portfolio — without the expected return falling proportionally. This is the core of Modern Portfolio Theory.
The central idea: don't put all your eggs in one basket.
Correlation — the key to diversification. Correlation measures how two investments move relative to each other, on a scale of −1 to +1. The lower the correlation between two investments, the greater the diversification benefit.
| Example | Correlation | Meaning |
|---|---|---|
| Two identical ETFs | Move in perfect lockstep (+1) | No diversification benefit |
| Equities Europe + US | Move largely together | Limited diversification benefit |
| Equities + government bonds | No correlation / slightly negative | Good diversification benefit |
| Equities + gold (historically) | Partly move in opposite directions | Best diversification — rarely exists in practice |
| Move in perfect opposition (−1) | Theory | Barely exists |
2.3 Currency Risks
Most global ETFs contain stocks in various currencies — dollars, yen, pounds. As a European investor you ultimately calculate in euros. Exchange rate fluctuations then affect your return, even if the underlying stocks have increased in value.
How currency risk works — example: you buy an S&P 500 ETF.
- Purchase: S&P 500 at 5,000, exchange rate €1 = $1.10
- Sale: S&P 500 at 5,500 (+10%), exchange rate €1 = $1.20
- Result: (1.10 × 1.10 / 1.20) − 1 = +0.8% in EUR instead of +10%
The dollar weakening of ~8.3% has almost entirely eaten up the equity return. It can also work in your favour: if the dollar strengthens, you boost your return in euros.
Currency risk by region in the MSCI World:
| Region | Currency | MSCI World weight |
|---|---|---|
| United States | USD ($) | ~74% |
| Eurozone | EUR (€) | ~10% |
| Japan | JPY (¥) | ~6% |
| United Kingdom | GBP (£) | ~4% |
| Switzerland | CHF | ~3% |
2.4 Why Time Is the Most Powerful Ingredient
At 7% return, starting 10 years earlier yields more than doubling the monthly contribution. The last row shows that €400/mo for 20 years still produces less than €200/mo for 40 years — despite the same total investment.
| Scenario | Duration | Contribution/mo | Total invested | Final value (7%/yr) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Start early | 40 years | €200 | €96.000 | ~€528.000 |
| Standard | 30 years | €200 | €72.000 | ~€227.000 |
| Start later | 20 years | €200 | €48.000 | ~€104.000 |
| Catch up with more | 20 years | €400 | €96.000 | ~€208.000 |
2.5 Nominal vs. Real Return
Your return on paper (nominal) is not the same as what your return is actually worth (real). Inflation erodes purchasing power. If you receive 4% interest but inflation is 3%, your real return is only about 1%.
The formula (approximation): Real return ≈ Nominal return − Inflation
More precise (Fisher equation): Real return = (1 + nominal) ÷ (1 + inflation) − 1
Practical examples:
| Situation | Nominal | Real | Conclusion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Savings (2022, NL) | ~0% | Strongly negative (inflation ~10%) | Large loss of purchasing power |
| Savings account (2023) | ~1.5% | Negative (inflation ~4%) | Loss of purchasing power |
| Term deposit (2024) | ~3% | Minimal growth | Barely any gain |
| Bonds (government bond) | ~3–5% | Slightly positive | Variable |
| Equities (historical avg.) | ~9–10% | ~+6% real | Real wealth growth |